|
Jesus--Presbyterian
The Trinity
[May 1994 Presbyterian Survey*]* Now Presbyterians Today
The Triune God The doctrine of the Trinity is not irrational.
By William E. Phipps
Presbyterians have come to make a lot of Advent and they
occasionally observe Lent, but they usually overlook the Trinity
season of the church year. The longest season of the church year,
Trinity begins eight weeks after Easter and continues for about
half of the calendar year. The disregard of this season may be
due to the difficulty of harmonizing a reasonable faith with
what appears to be an irrational doctrine, the doctrine of the
Trinity.
There is one essence of God; the emphasis is on oneness,
not three-ness. The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy
Spirit is God--but they are one God.
The term Trinity wrongly suggests that Christians are tritheists.
To avert the erroneous idea of having triple gods, some have
appropriately placed a "u" in the midst of the word,
making it Triunity. Taken from the Latin tria, threefold, and
unus, one, this preserves the oneness notion intended by the
ecumenical councils of the fourth century that included the Trinity
in their creeds.
Muslims and Jews have presumed, as have some Christians,
that Christians worship three separate gods. An African Muslim
once said that the main difference between his religion and Christianity
was that he had several wives and one God, while Christians had
one wife and several gods. Muhammad thought Christians believed
in three different deities, one of them the goddess Mary, who
was impregnated by intercourse with the father God.
Although Muhammad held Jesus in high regard, he rejected
Christianity because he thought it contained polytheistic paganism.
He did not realize that monotheism is basic to the Christian
statement of belief, the Nicene Creed. Beginning with "I
believe in one God," this affirmation parallels the first
article of the creeds of Islam, "There is no God but Allah,"
and of Judaism, "The Lord our God is one Lord" (Deuteronomy
6:4).
Misrepresentations by outsiders of the Christian doctrine
of God may have arisen from the bewilderment of many church members
from the first century onward. This is seen in the confusion
that the Nicene formulation attempted to eliminate. Early Christians
found some of their oral and written traditions puzzling. Was
the God of the Old Testament a different God from the God of
the New Testament'? Did one God have no beginning and another
one have his beginning at Bethlehem? Was the God of law separate
from the God of grace? Were divine beings sent from heaven to
earth like
relay runners, one carrying on after another one finished?
And if Christ is God and if God is non-physical Spirit,
does that mean that Christ never really had flesh and blood?
Since there is no full discussion of these questions in the Bible,
the source of Christian doctrine, varying--indeed, clashing--answers
were given to these theological questions. Christians were in
a dilemma as to what to believe.
Constantine the Great, the first Christian emperor, decided
that the question of the relationship between the Creator and
Jesus must be resolved. He had become a Christian in the hope
that Christianity would help to unite his Roman government, which
was disintegrating from civil wars. However, he found that Christians
were themselves much divided over questions of doctrine. In an
effort to settle this matter, in A.D. 325 he asked the bishops
from the entire church to come together at Nicaea to discuss
and agree on a creed.
The gathering at Nicaea is called the first ecumenical
council because representatives came from churches in Asia, Africa
and Europe. (One of the participants was "Santa Claus,"
from Myra, Turkey, where he was known as Bishop Nicholas.)
The theological debate was intense, and not only at Nicaea.
One visitor to Constantinople wrote: "This city is full
of . . . common people who act like theologians in the shops
and streets. If you ask a man to change a piece of silver he
informs you wherein the Son differs from the Father; if you ask
for a loaf of bread you are told . . . that the Son is inferior
to the Father; and if you inquire whether the bath is ready,
the answer is that the Son was made out of nothing."
Two months of discussion centered in the difference made
by one iota, that is, the Greek letter i. One group maintained
that the Son and the Father were of the same substance (Greek
homo-ousion), while another group argued that they were of a
similar substance (homoi-ousion). At last the bishops took a
vote on the relationship of God the Father and the Son of God--a
Presbyterian-like, democratic manner of decision-making.
Later in the fourth century a second ecumenical council
met in Constantinople to deal with the relationship of the Holy
Spirit to the Father and the Son. What is called the Nicene Creed
contains an additional paragraph about the Holy Spirit that was
added in 381.
A medieval diagram often found in European cathedral windows
expresses the gist of the Nicene formulation. The central ring
affirms monotheism. There is one essence of God; the emphasis
is on oneness, not three-ness. The Father is God, the Son is
God, and the Holy Spirit is God--but they are one God. An equilateral
triangle around the circle represents the equality of the three
expressions of the Godhead. This symbol also conveys the idea
that there are three simultaneous expressions of the divine substance.
It is not that first we have God the Father, then at a later
time God the Son, and after
both of these the Holy Spirit carries the relay torch.
Beginning with Augustine in the fifth century, attempts
have been made to provide analogies from our human experiences
to shed light on the doctrine of the Trinity. For instance, Augustine
extracted a clear comparison from botany:
"The root is wood, the trunk is wood, and the branches
are wood, while nevertheless it is not three woods that are thus
spoken of, but only one.... [Thus] no one should think it absurd
that we should call the Father God, the Son God, the Holy Spirit
God, and that these are not three gods in the
Trinity, but one God and one substance."
Other helpful illustrations have been proposed. Consider
the process involved in an experience of art: First there is
the initial idea in the creator's mind. The idea is then expressed
in a physical way the literary artist puts words on paper; the
musical artist writes down notes; the graphic artist paints a
canvas. When the book is published, the music played, or the
drawing viewed an effect is made on those who read, hear or see
it. Just as there is a threefold aspect of art as idea, expression
and effect, so there is a three-in-one revelation of God.
In her Call to Faith, Presbyterian educator Rachel Henderlite
laments the lingering Trinitarian misunderstandings that have
resulted in three-headed monstrosities. "The doctrine has
often confused the thinking of the individual Christian as much
as it has clarified and strengthened it," she observes.
She finds this analogy of A. H. Mollegen especially helpful:
"The light (the Father) shines through the colored slide
(the Son) to cast an image (the Holy Spirit) on the screen (the
church)."
The solar disk, rays and heat also offer a helpful analogy:
There is the transcendent God over us who is too brilliant to
be gazed at directly; there is Jesus who is "God with us"
("Emmanuel" in Hebrew); and there is the warmth of
the Holy Spirit within us.
Electromagnetic force provides a similar analogy: No one
has seen this basic energy of the universe, and yet we witness
electricity in distinct ways: We experience it as shock if we
put our finger in an outlet. This is quite different from seeing
it as light in a light bulb or feeling it as heat from a stove.
In a similar manner the one invisible God is experienced in various
modes.
There is, however, a distinct deficiency in comparing God
to the sun or to electricity; a personal analogy is needed to
point to our personal God. In classical drama an actor often
wore different masks to play several roles. These masks were
called personas, which translated literally means "through
which the sound comes." Sabellius, a Christian teacher in
the third century, believed that a succession of divine impersonations
was sent forth from heaven to earth during three acts in the
cosmic theater. During the Old Testament act there was God the
Father, during the gospel act there was God the Son,
and after both of these came the Holy Spirit.
However, according to the Nicene formulation, there are
three simultaneous expressions of the divine substance. Consider
the several roles that an individual can play on the stage of
life: In relation to our parents we are a son or a daughter;
in relation to our boss or teacher we are an employee or student;
in relation to our spouse we are a husband or a wife. Which is
the true person? Are not all of these expressions simultaneous?
When we sing, "God in three Persons" in the hymn "Holy,
Holy, Holy!"
(the tune "Nicaea"), we might think of three performance
or relationship modes of one actor or person.
In God Was in Christ Donald Baillie, one of the most influential
Presbyterian scholars of this century, provides a simple but
profound interpretation of the doctrine of divine Triunity. Reflecting
on the historical experiences of the early Christians, he writes:
"The doctrine of the Trinity sums up the gospel by telling
us that the God of grace, who was revealed through the Incarnation
and Pentecost as the One who paradoxically works in us what he
demands of us, is the same from all eternity and for ever more;
so . . . Christians can sing: 'Glory be to the Father, and to
the Son, and to the Holy Ghost: as it was in the beginning, is
now and ever shall be, world without end.'" Baillie integrates
the
devotional life of a Christian into a satisfying intellectual
treatment of the church's basic doctrine of the Trinity.
In spite of these explanations, some people, even some
scholars, have dismissed the Christian doctrine of a triune God
as irrational. Thomas Jefferson, for example, embraced Unitarianism
after concluding that the doctrine of the Trinity was mathematically
inane; he maintained that one plus one plus one always equals
three. However, when three equal and mutually dependent forces
operate together, the
addition signs should be replaced by multiplication marks: one
times one times one equals one.
There is a profound complexity in the orthodox Christian
doctrine of God, but it is not incomprehensible. Although humans
do not have a full understanding of God, there is a reasonable
basis for belief in the triune God. The doctrine expresses genuine
monotheism.
William E. Phipps is professor of religion and philosophy
at Davis & Elkins College, Elkins, W.Va. He is the author
of The Wisdom and Wit of Rabbi Jesus, recently published by Westminster/John
Knox Press, among other books.
 |