|
Mistaken Criticism
It's June 2001 and I'm getting mail chastising me for not
believing in a literal hell. One person even scolded me for
doing a great dis-service to my readers. Those who think I don't
believe in an actual place of final punishment are very mistaken.
The Bible clearly teaches that unrepentant sinners will receive
eternal punishment. Revelation 20:15 clearly states, "And
whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast
into the lake of fire." Maybe my critics formed their opinions
based on my questioning the exact location of hell (which by
strict definition I mean a place of fiery punishment). To date,
no one seems to know where hell is. Few are willing even to
speculate. So, let's ask the question again, and this time I'll
provide a little background by repeating an article I wrote back
in August 1998.
A reader writes: " I have been wondering about a place
called Gehenna, my friend (who is a Muslim) said it was a place
outside of Jerusalem, deep as the Grand Canyon, where they would
throw trash. They say hell is 300 times hotter than earth, and
he said when the trash would decompose it would heat up. People
called this place hell. He said that is where hell derived from.
Is this true?"
My response is that your Muslim friend is--correct, partly correct,
mistaken and guessing. First, it is important to understand the
Valley of Gehenna and the Valley of Hinnom are the same place.
The word Gehenna is simply how the Hebrew word was spelled when
translated into Greek, the language of the New Testament. Take
for example the modern German city named Koln (pronounced kerln).
In English we translate it as Cologne. Such is the case with
Hinnom and Gehenna. You might say Gehenna is the Greekized version
of Hinnom.
Now, back to your friend. He is correct in that there is a
place outside of Jerusalem called Gehenna or the Valley of Hinnom.
However, scholars say, "The tradition that makes the Valley
of Gehenna a place of burning rubbish, and thus a type of the
fires of hell, appears to have originated with Rabbi Kimchi,
a Jewish scholar of the 12th and 13th centuries. Ancient Jewish
literature knows nothing of such an idea." 5BC335.
As to the valley being deep as the Grand Canyon, your friend
is mistaken. Geographic survey maps show that the valley varies
from 620 meters above sea level at its lowest point to 713 meters
at its highest point. This makes the valley about 300 feet deep
and around a mile long.
As to the temperature of hell, this raises an interesting point.
Some say that not all hells are hot. Descriptions of hell seem
to be limited only by imagination. I understand that Hindus
say there are twenty-one hells and Buddhists say there are eight
hot and eight cold hells. Dante, a Roman Catholic poet of the
Middle Ages, remarked after supposedly visiting in hell that
he saw a thousand wretched faces twisted by the bitter cold--and
he shuddered to think of the frozen areas there. After Dante's
imaginary tour of hell, he described Satan as having three faces,
one between white and yellow, one a dark brown, and the third
as flaming red. Also, Dante described Satan as having wings
like a bat which fanned the air and made chilling winds. He
pictured Satan as standing in ice up to his chest while chomping
on a sinner in each of his three mouths. So, is hell 300 times
hotter than earth? Who knows, I don't, but I will agree, the
Bible says its really really hot!
The Valley of Gehenna (Hinnom) is mentioned in both the Old
and New Testaments. It became infamous because it was where
an Israel king burned his children as an offering to a pagan
god. 2 Chronicles 28:3, "Moreover he [Ahaz] burnt incense
in the valley of the son of Hinnom, and burnt his children in
the fire, after the abominations of the heathen . . ."
Of Manasseh, another Israelite king, we read, "And he caused
his children to pass through the fire in the valley of the son
of Hinnom. . ." It appears that it wasn't only the kings
who engaged in this terrible act. We read in Jeremiah 7:31,
"And they [the children of Judah] have built the high places
of Tophet, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn
their sons and daughters in the fire; which I commanded them
not, neither came it into my heart."
However, a Divine warning was given. "Therefore, behold,
the days come, saith the Lord, that it shall no more be called
Tophet, nor the valley of the son of Hinnom, but the valley of
slaughter: for they shall bury Tophet till there be no place.
And the carcases of this people shall be meat for the fowls
of heaven, and for the beasts of the earth; and none shall fray
them away." Accordingly, the fires of Hinnom became a symbol
of God's last day judgment of sinners in the ancient Jewish way
of thinking. Therefore, when Jesus referred to the Valley of
Hinnom three times in the Sermon on the Mount, his hearers knew
exactly the point he was making.
Which brings us to the last and final point. The translators
of the King James Version of the Bible chose to use the word
"hell" as a substitute for longer phrase Valley of
Hinnom. You can see this in Matthew 5:22, 29, 30 and other places.
It appears that the translators felt that readers would be confused
or not grasp the meaning if the text read, "cast into the
Valley of Hinnom" as Matthew 5:29 might read.
Blessings in your study
of God's Word!
Marvin Hunt
There
is never a charge for my articles, and if you have a good reason,
there is no limit to how many you may request. However, if you
find them valuable you may want to order my latest book, History,
Mystery and Facts About the Bible. Order at 1-800-845-7618 (ext.
301). You may also order from Amazon.com. Proceeds from the book
go to support this ministry.
Blessings!
Marvin Hunt
Http://www.biblehistory.com
p.s.
A new column is posted weekly. Be sure and bookmark the site
or put it on your favorites list. |